Confessions
of a Ballet Junkie Full Text
Tom Parsons
Skip to part 2: Beginnings
Skip to part 3: The Music
Back to Jim's Performance page
This copy was retrieved from a copy that was originally posted on Tom Parsons' own website, and then archived on the Gaynor Minden website, and after deletion from that site, retrieved via Wayback Machine. It made available here for general public information. I have attempted to preserve Tom Parsons' original simple style of presentation as well as I remember it.
True enjoyment
comes from activity of the mind
and exercise of
the body; the two are ever united.
--Humboldt
I am going to
try to convey what that experience is like,
and I will tell you how I found my way into this alien, rarefied,
sweaty, but
delightful world. I'm not going to give a description of ballet classes
beyond
the most sketchy outline, just enough to provide background for getting
the
experience across; you can find detailed accounts in many books. (I've
supplied
a few technical details in footnotes.) And I'm not going to tell you
what it's
like for a gifted and talented dancer; I'm going to tell you what it's
like for
a klutz.
If you have
never taken a ballet class, it is hard to
understand why anyone would want to, unless possibly he or she were
stage-struck or aspiring to be a dancer. A description of the things
one does
in class must leave the reader wondering why anyone in his right mind
would
want to do them. Indeed, even the actual steps in ballet tend to sound
silly if
you haven't seen how they look. Why would anyone jump straight up in
the air
and wiggle his legs back and forth, back and forth, as fast as
possible, while
he was up there? As H. Allen Smith wrote, "What a hell of a thing for a
grown man to do!" But an entrechat is an electrifying sight. The word
means "braided" or "interwoven," and when the step is well
done the eye is dazzled by the sight of the dancer's legs as they seem
to
spiral about each other.*
------------
*The entrechat, I learned, goes quite far back in dance
history and probably predates ballet. Mr Fezziwig's "cut," in A
Christmas Carol, was almost certainly an entrechat.
------------
Men find their
way into ballet in various ways. The history
of ballet records many cases in which men got into it only because they
were
pushed into it. Ballet is sometimes recommended by physicians as a
therapeutic
measure for sickly children, for example; or a boy may be pushed into
it
because his sister is interested in taking classes. This happened to
George
Balanchine, who was accepted by the Imperial School when his sister
went to
audition and who hated it so much that he ran away and had to be sent
back.
Edward Villella was also pushed into ballet because of his sister, and
he hated
it, too. But ultimately both Balanchine and Villella were seduced by
the art.
("Seduced," indeed, is Villella's word.) Villella went on to be a
star, in a company that as a matter of policy didn't have stars, and
Balanchine
went on to be (in my opinion) the greatest choreographer of the
twentieth
century and one of the greatest of all time.
Some men also
go into ballet for the sake of the exercise.
It is splendid exercise, perhaps the very best. Dance of any kind is a
healthy
activity, and one of the safest if you know what you're doing; and
ballet, in
particular, makes your body much better looking than working out at a
gym does:
the muscles are developed in a way that keeps the body's proportions
pleasing
and avoids the absurd and ugly hyperplasias one so frequently sees in
gymnasts.
Many men have also found that ballet training improves their
performance as
athletes.
It is one of
the most arduous and exacting arts known to
man. Ballet is tough. It engages the entire person, mind as well as
body. This
makes it harder than most intellectual disciplines, which engage
primarily the
mind, and harder than most kinds of athletics, which engage mostly the
body.
Many people will tell you mathematics is the hardest discipline they
have ever
encountered. But if you do math, you may have to beat your brains out
finding
how to get from this equation to the next; but in so doing you need
only
concentrate on the problem at hand. But in ballet you must concentrate
on
everything (which, when you come to think of it, is a contradiction in
terms).
It is as if, in math, you had to concern yourself with your posture at
the
table, and with how you are holding the pencil, and with how
beautifully you
are writing the symbols that go into that next equation and whether it
is
centered on its line. And ballet happens in real time; they are playing
music
and you must keep up with it. In math, if you need twenty minutes to
decide
what your next step must be, you take twenty minutes. (Isaac Newton
once took a
full week.) But you cannot delay for twenty minutes as you figure out
which
foot to move next or which way to turn your head.
A musician must
control the body as well as the mind, to be
sure, but the control of the body doesn't go into nearly as much
detail. You
must sit straight at the piano, for example, at the proper distance
from the
keyboard and with your forearms and wrists level; you must know when to
flex
the wrists and when to keep them still; you must know how much to curl
the
fingers as they strike the keys; but that's it: after the first couple
of years
you don't need to keep concentrating on your posture as you play, and
the
position of the legs is of no great importance as long as your feet are
poised
over the pedals. You cannot ignore posture ever when you dance. And
when you
play the piano, as a dancer who was also a pianist pointed out to me
once, the
instrument and the executant are separate; in ballet, they are one and
the
same. "It's as if you had to build your piano at the same time you were
learning to play it," she said. I thought this a remarkable
observation--although actually a singer could say the same thing--and I
quoted
it to my wife, Pat, when I got home. She topped it: "It's as if what
you
were building were a piano in a Dali painting," she said, "that might
sag out of shape and require rework if left unattended too long."
Bodies
are like that.
But it is
enjoyable, too, and in my experience the harder
you work the more fun you have. Villella was right: it is seductive.
The
pleasure and satisfaction that you derive from learning even the
simplest step
make up abundantly for all the work, and every new step mastered brings
a new
delight. For me, in fact, the enjoyment has always been the main
consideration
and the healthy exercise only secondary. If it were more generally
known how it
feels to take ballet classes, the studios would be packed and there
would be
waiting lists to get in. (Whether exercise to jazz is as much fun, I
can't say,
but the prevalence of "jazzercise" classes suggests that it may be.
If you love fine music, however, the jazz exercise option is pretty
much out of
the question.) It can also induce a wonderful peace of mind. A friend
told me
he took ballet classes when he was in graduate school "as a way of
staying
sane." A young lady told me, one day at the end of class, that she had
come there tired and cross, after a sleepless night full of cares, and
that the
class had restored her good humor. Ballet does such things for you.
Some people
have a natural physical gift. They are well
coördinated, they have stamina and endurance, they have a good sense of
balance, and they find moving to music gracefully a natural and easy
thing to
do. Certainly this must be true of anyone who becomes a professional
dancer.
But the person I mean to reach doesn't have these gifts. Moreover, the
person I
mean to reach probably never thought of taking ballet classes; that is
not the
kind of thing he does. To him, ballet is a funny art in which
ridiculously
garbed people dance in outlandish ways, and ballet classes are for
little girls
who want to learn to move gracefully or who have ambitious mothers.
That is the
way it looked to me, and I hope that maybe I can implant in such a
reader's
mind the notion that ballet might be a challenging, rewarding, and
joyful
experience.